Temetwir

27.6.06

يو أينت قُت شت اون أه نقا

دراسة زيّها زيّ "دراسات" مجلس الوزراء ياخونّه






بناء الامال على انتخابات الفين وستة = محمد عبده ورابح صقر خابين روحهم دقدقة وغناوي حق المنتخب السعودي

عبدالله النيباري = محمد الشلهوب؟

ودام خاربه خاربه:

احمد الفهد = اوكرانيا
محمد ضيف الله = اسبانيا


"الوطنيون" الكويتيون = المنتخب السعودي في مونديال 2006

أيّ والله, كلنا معاك يالأخضر

20.6.06

بيكوز اي سيد سو

- Look at me. What is it exactly about my choice of font, or size of script here that makes you think I care what you think, when I know what you think is wrong?
I believe everyone has the right to think what they think, yes; but I also believe that for all matters there can only be one right stance. Luckily enough, I like to think I have (the) enough (amount of) self-respect to think that what I think is true and not what has been imposed or forced on my not so fine self. If you think something when you don't know it, then that's just a waste of time and effort.
Thinking you know is a whole different thing from knowing you know. The latter being just as bad as 'thinking you think'.
It's not personal; I fuck with everybody.

- Having spent two weeks in Kuwait, I have failed to see any of the reported, and recurring, annoyances that many people bore me to death with. Here is why.
I don't walk into a place thinking beforehand what I want to think of people. If I walk into a mall and think "all guys with chmaghs will look like rabi7 sagir", then that's exactly what I will see.
If I walk into a mall and think "all girls will be dressed accordingly", then that would not be exactly what I see, but it is what I will see, no doubt.
Here's the thing. There are far too many things in the universe going on at one time, that you only see what you want to see. If you think Kuwait is way behind and that it's where guys annoy girls, and where girls annoy guys, then please drop me a line and I will be very, very happy to pay for your one-way ticket to land on my dick.
However, if you wish to note that Kuwait is behind and does not take itself seriously on the more serious level, then that is something I would gladly discuss. Manners intact and all.

- I think individual thought is something that we as human beings lack. I think individual thought is misinterpeted when it is shown, and I think individual thought owns your life.
Relating to the first point - if you consider these to be points, like I do. Not. - I proposed that what you think you think is not what you think you know and that in turn is not what you know you know; and thus, please do yourself the favour of not believing everything you hear coming out of the mouth of a candidate running for parliament. This will in turn make my life so much easier because I would not have to hear about St. Abedal Naibarus, or Pope Welyadikt Tabtebater II.
Fuck the five constituencies/districts/circles if that's all those guys are going to talk about and fuck you too if you want to vote for them based solely on where they stand on the matter.
I know that because I am yet to come across a candidate who discusses Maktab Il Shaal's latest report.

- I think young moms are the hottest thing that ever stepped foot on this planet. Had to vent.

- Courtesy of my friend, I read banat il reyath on the plane. The Ba7raini flight attendant asked me to where I got when he saw the book in my hand, and I told him I didn't start it yet and asked if he'd read it already. He said he didn't finish it yet but that he thinks that what he has already read of it was true. I concur.
The only thing I would note about the book is that the author at times does not seem like she cares what I, the reader, think what she thinks. In other words, the reliance on the narrator (writer of emails) does flow nicely, but at times is sort of boring because there is no 'real opinion' (of the author) to which you may want to contend or agree with. Works both ways though, since at the end the narrator can be taken as a main character and not just a narrator. Yeah.
Mad respect to Dr Jamal Buresly.

- I bought an electric can opener yesterday. O wa7da mn el thentain, ya ana ma3arflaha, ya ehy sij ghabeya. I think it's a bit of both. You in the back who said ana el ghabi, chairz lav.
So, back to the 3ali-way of opening cans. Get a knife, pinch it in the metal, and "pull on it". That's one. You now have a "line that is cut". Take knife out, strike the metal again, and pull again. You now pull to make a Triangular-shape, making both "lines" meet at a point. Then you literally cut the point, raise the metal just enough to fit a finger, and proceed to open the can.
Sweetcorn never tasted better.


طلال العيار "أبغض ما عنده" تفرقة وتقسيم الشعب الكويتي الى طوائف وفئات و"كل تلك المسميات الكريهة". طيّب.
عيّل فسرلي بارك الله فيك يالحبيب, شلون ما تبي تقسم المجتمع وبعدين تقول لازم كل الفئات و"الشرائح" تمثـل في المجلس؟
مامداك, توّك تقول ما تبي تقسم, عيل على اي اساس تبي الجميع يمثل؟
بالأحرى, أي جميع وأنت من يقول بعدم وجود "الجميع" بل وجود "الكويتيون" فقط.
اذا فيك خير, دع "الجميع" تعني التوجهات والفكر من خلال الاحزاب.

قلت أحزاب يا بو مبارك, وليس أنساب.

تهجموا بعض الناس على محمد المطير لأنه قال لعبدالله النيباري انه كذاب, أو فيما معناه كذاب. وشتان ما بين الأمرين. لكن نطوّفها الحين ونشوف شنهي اخرة الدلع والمياعة عند البعض وعقلية لا اوعى ما اتؤلشي كدا.. "جاء ذلك جراء ادعاء" النيباري على ان محمد المطير مدعوم من قبل مجموعة الاخوان المسلمين. والناس زعلت على المطير ليش انه قال حق واحد "قد ابوه"- الله يرحمه - انه يكذب.
أكرر
He may have said it, but not in so many words. مثل ما يقولون عيال خالتنا مارغرت

مادري, المطير ماخذ دور النيباري عند كاشير الجمعية؟
شدخل العمر بالموضوع, وانتوا نفسكم الناس الي قلتوا عمر النيباري لا يعيب انه ينزل بالانتخابات.
يقوله ماني راد عليك لأنك تكبرني؟ ليش ما يقوله خلاص اتنازل عن الانتخابات لان انت مرشح, وترى مو عن شي بس لانك اكبر مني.
أشوف لما "الياهل" الي بالادارية قام و"طوّل لسانه" على الدويلة كان عادي؟
وفعلا ً عادي.
المشكلة ان الي يسمع يقول الحين المطير عمره 18
يعني انا الي عمري 22 هم راح ينوخذ مني موقف اذا كنت عاتبت المطير وقلتله يحترم نفسه؟

وبعدين السياسي المحنك الي كل من يطبل له ويرفع فيه, يكون رده على ذكر تاريخه السياسي في خلط الأوراق والتقول بأن القانون المعني هو أيضا صوّت عليه من قبل جماعة فلان والا علان؟
وانت شكو من صوّت مع القانون؟
وهل رد "السالفة صار لها 14 سنة" عذر مثلا؟ طيّب, صار له 14 سنة لكنه طالع لمدى عشرين وللحين الكلام داير

يالله ما عليه, ممن يسمون ليبراليين ما ينوخذ منهم لا حق ولا باطل. أو بالأحرى, ما ينوخذ منهم غير الباطل.

وأخيراً, أبلغني "صديق البرنامج" حميّد المطيري بأن هناك "تصوّر" للدائرة الواحدة من قبل الحكومة.
"ذا كاتج" هو ان الناخب يكون له صوتين فقط.
قلت له انه هذا الشيء لن يطوف ولا يطوّف, لكنه أصر على خلاف ذلك.
شرايكم يا جماعة الخير؟